The source of truth for your legal AI
A third-party score for contract AI.
Don't just rely on the vendor's benchmark to satisfy your ethical and fiduciary obligations. Validate it with Legal Ground Truth — we start with NDAs: the same contracts through many models, a licensed attorney on the disagreements, and a report you can put in the file.
What the report is
Same contracts. Many models. One attorney on the disagreements.
- Comparative, not self-reported. Every model reads the same real contracts, so results are directly comparable — no vendor picking its own test.
- Clause-by-clause comparison. The report lines up how each model read each clause — side by side, with the attorney's call where they disagree.
- Independent validation you can cite. A third-party comparative report that counsel can rely on instead of the vendor's own numbers.
The source of truth for your legal AI
Don't just rely on the vendor's benchmark to satisfy your ethical and fiduciary obligations. Validate it with Legal Ground Truth.
Proprietary independent benchmarks
We develop proprietary independent benchmarks — separate from any vendor's self-reported numbers. The validation is yours.
The system compounds
Every new contract and every model run makes Legal Ground Truth stronger. The comparative record grows over time, so your next evaluation is built on a deeper base.
Attorney-backed ground truth
Where models disagree or are unsure, a licensed attorney makes the call. That reading is the standard in the comparative report — not another AI grading yours.
Why an independent score
Contract AI is already in live workflows. The missing piece is a second opinion that does not come from the people selling the tool.
Not the vendor's benchmark
Every vendor publishes numbers on a test it chose. Counsel owes their client more than that. This is the independent check you run before you rely on the tool.
Same contracts, every model
No model gets to pick its own test. Every tool reads the same real NDAs, so the comparison is direct — with a licensed attorney's reading as the standard where they disagree.
A report for the file
When someone asks how the tool was vetted, you have a written answer: the same contracts, run through many models, with an attorney's reading as the standard.
Who it is for
General counsel and law firms
You already bought a contract-AI tool, or you are about to. The report is the independent second opinion you can rely on — and point to — instead of the vendor's own numbers.
Contract-AI vendors
Your customers' counsel will ask for an independent score sooner or later. Show up with a third-party comparative report instead of your own eval.
NDAs are the first contract pack. Other contract types will follow the same process — same contracts across models, attorney on the disagreements — as the corpus grows.
Get the comparative report
Tell us which tool or model you are evaluating. We run it against the same NDAs as every other model and send you the comparative report.
Request the report